It’s new leadership model season.
You know the one. The time of year when organizations quietly escort the leadership model they spent hundreds of millions of dollars developing out the back door, after years of training, posters, laminated wallet cards, and town halls, and replace it with something bold, modern, and urgently necessary.
Over the past few weeks of the new year, it seems like half the conversations I’m in are about “refreshing,” “reimagining,” or “reinventing” leadership development.
But why?
The cynic in me says this: with all the turnover in talent development and HR leadership, the safest path to job security is to declare whatever exists as “outdated,” hire a consulting firm, spend a year (or two) designing a new leadership model, and then launch a massive training initiative to roll it out.
Mission accomplished. Rinse and repeat.
But that’s not the whole story. And it’s not even the most important part.
The real reason leadership models are getting blown up is that the world leaders are operating in has fundamentally changed; economically, politically, socially, technologically, and operationally. The gap between what leaders are trained to do and what they are actually required to do has become painfully obvious.
So yes, companies do need new leadership models in 2026, but not for the reasons most decks suggest.
Here are five practical reasons that actually matter.
Read More >

