For 40 years, I’ve listened to leaders say the same thing:

Read More >

As I have shared previously, some of the best ideas for our blogs come straight from the field, and this one is spot on! I’m currently building a leadership microsimulation for a client, and as part of the design process, I interviewed several senior leaders about their most pressing challenges.

One theme came through loud and clear:

“New leaders are struggling with acquisitions.”

Not the deal mechanics. Not the strategy slides.

The integration.

Leadership challenges such as:

• How to welcome new teams.
• How to introduce culture, systems, and expectations.
• How to make decisions when everything feels politically sensitive.

And perhaps most importantly:

“They are too scared to take a position… so things fall through the cracks and we are left with a mess.”

That’s the real problem.

Integration doesn’t fail because of bad intent, it fails because of leadership hesitation at exactly the wrong moment or worse yet, making the wrong decisions by making no decisions.

Here are five very current, very practical tips for new leaders stepping into an acquisition integration:

Read More >

If you listen to enough AI conversations these days, you might start to believe that the future of business decision-making will be entirely automated.

• Algorithms analyze the data.
• The system generates insights.
• Leaders simply approve the recommendation.

But something interesting is starting to happen in companies that are deeply integrating AI into their decision-making processes.

The more data they analyze, the more they are rediscovering something important.

Data does not replace judgment.

In fact, the explosion of data and AI-driven insights may actually make human judgment more important than ever.

In our work designing business acumen simulations for leaders around the world, we constantly emphasize that data is only one part of the decision-making process.

The real skill of leadership is knowing how to interpret the data and when to challenge it.

Here are five reasons why human judgment still plays a critical role in the age of AI.

Read More >

If you listen to the business headlines these days, you might conclude that artificial intelligence should be used for everything.

Read More >

AI is everywhere in learning right now. New tools are launching weekly, demos are impressive, production speeds are faster than ever, and new vendors are creating mass confusion as we are
inundated with unsolicited emails about the latest and greatest tools.  For many Learning & Development (L&D) teams, the core question has not changed: how does any of this actually improve learning, performance, and business results?

That question is what led us to develop our AI in Learning Framework™. The framework is a practical way to think about how AI supports learning end-to-end, not as a set of disconnected tools, but as a system that improves capability, decision-making, and performance.

What we are seeing today is a pattern that should feel familiar, as many L&D professionals lived through CBT, WBT, Cloud-based learning, and the COVID-induced virtual learning phenomena. As before, organizations are adopting AI in pockets. Content generation in one area, a chatbot in another, a dashboard somewhere else. Each initiative shows value on its own, but together they rarely add up to a cohesive whole. The result is more output and faster production, but not necessarily better decision-making or stronger performance.

This is where it becomes important to distinguish between efficiency and productivity.

Read More >